Homelessness - Challenging Decisions


Despite the fact that some Local Authority decisions can be challenging to comprehend at the best of times, following the commencement of the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 bringing a challenge against a homeless decision is mostly unchanged. There are some new duties as we have discussed previously but breach of these new duties can still be challenged under section 202 of the Housing Act 1996, in the same way as before.

One new preliminary consideration to bear in mind when dealing with every new homeless case is that since a new Act has come in to force which imposes different duties that will apply to new applicants. There is a fork in the road from the date of its commencement on 3rd April 2018. All applications submitted prior to that date are subject to the old law and new applications are subject to the new law. Therefore, if you find that a Local Authority decision in relation to an application submitted prior to 3rd April 2018 has had the new law applied, or vice versa, that decision can be challenged on the basis of the Authority having applied the wrong law. This might seem unlikely but we have already had a client come through our doors with this very issue, the decision in question was withdrawn and the client was provided interim accommodation.

Breach of Duty

Under the old scheme of legislation, certain decisions from a Local Authority that could be a breach of duty (or duties) owed to homeless applicants by a Local Authority would be challenged under section 202 of the Housing Act 1996. Such a challenge could arise from a negative decision against an applicant or a failure to act in accordance with a duty. Examples of this include:

  1. a discharge of duty decision, or

  2. failure to accept an application from an eligible applicant.

Section 202 of the Housing Act 1996 still applies following the commencement of the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 so the situation here is much the same as before. However, the introduction of new duties owed to homeless applicants mean that there are new ways that a Local Authority can be in breach of duties they are under. Examples of these new grounds for a section 202 review include, but are not limited to:

  1. Failure to provide an applicant with a written Personalised Housing Plan (PHP);

  2. Failure to comply with an action under the PHP that the council agreed they would carry out;

  3. Failure to apply the new prevention or relief duties; and
  4. Offers of unsuitable accommodation (which are subject to provisions other than just section 202 Housing Act 1996).

This blog has been prepared on 13th June 2018 by Sayim Rezvi, a Paralegal at MTG Solicitors.

Connect With Us

Request a Meeting Today »

Request a Short, Free Meeting With Us Today.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
terms of use.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Visit Our Offices

Warley Chambers
2nd Floor
Warley Road
Hayes, Middlesex
UB4 0PX
United Kingdom

Phone: 020 3026 2548
Fax: 020 8561 2800
Map & Directions


Boom Zone
22 Uxbridge Road
Ealing
W5 2RJ
United Kingdom

Phone: 020 3026 2548
Fax: 020 8561 2800
Map & Directions


Contact:
Phone: 020 3026 2548
Fax: 020 8561 2800
Email: info@mtgsolicitors.com
DX 44655 (HAYES) Middx

Emergency Numbers:
Conveyancing: 07949 721 099
Crime: 07944 133 788
Family/Domestic Violence: 07944 133 982
Housing: 07506 626 262
Immigration: 07904 787 255

We speak your language!

Languages spoken by our expert team

Albanian

Bulgarian

Dari

Greek

Gujurati

Hindi

Mandarin

Punjabi

Romanian

Russian

Spanish

Urdu

  • Conveyancing Quality Lawyers
  • Criminal Litigation Lawyers
  • Immigration Accreditation Lawyers
  • Super Lawyers
  • Best Lawyers
Back To Top